Skip to content

박선우

My feedback

1 result found

  1. 262 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    박선우 supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    박선우 commented  · 

    This is very frustrating. Basically, SE asks if it should keep the original or overwrite a fresh copy. If I keep the original, I have a 7/10 chance of a messed up file. (Based on countless experiences) If I overwrite, then it takes another freaking hour to copy over what I had in the first place.

    So, two solutions: either SE checks MD5 of both files or checks byte sizes of both files, it should either overwrite existing data or (even cooler) resume writing missing data. That would be freaking awesome.

Feedback and Knowledge Base